Support |
Interesting perspective Andy - thanks for mentioning that. My current looper is a RiffBox, which also requires a loop to start at the beginning of a bar... But in cases (like you mention) where a loop isn't best initiated at the beginning of the 1st bar, a workaround is to start at the middle of the loop. So with 2-bar loop, you'd start at the beginning of bar 2 and cycle through bar 1 to that point again. Once the looping starts, it gives the impression of a seamless loop starting at bar 1. I could see this workaround/solution also applying for the Pigtronix Infinity. - Jim --- On Mon, 11/12/12, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > From: andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> > Subject: Re: Any news on LP2, anyone? > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > Date: Monday, November 12, 2012, 2:51 AM > Jim Bjorklun wrote: > > > 2) When synching a LP2 loop to MIDI clock, how does the > loop recording start and stop work? For example, the > Pigtronix Infinity does this: > > > > --> Rec – Recording starts at the start of the > next measure after the switch has been pressed. > > --> Stop – Stops loop audio at the start of the > next measure after the switch has been pressed. > > > > This strikes me as an elegant method, and I'm curious > if the LP2 also operates like this, or in a different way. > > > > Rick will fill in the answers, but on this point. > > That's *not* a good way to do record for midi sync, > although it probably seems to be if you haven't actually > used sync. > To assume that the 'riff' (or whatever) starts at the > beginning of the bar > is just really strange, perhaps influenced by drum machine > programming > and some sample based music. A lot of time the musician > plays a lead in beat to the start > of the bar, and quite often the first beat is accented by > placing it slightly > forward in time. > What's needed is to start to record straight away, but end > the recording automatically > so that loop length becomes an exact multiple of the bar > length. > > That's how the LP1 works when syncing tracks internally, > it's the tried and > tested method on any well designed product, so I'd guess > that's what the LP2 does. > > I like the Pigtronix stuff a lot, but they don't have the > long history of working with live looping that's needed to > really get that right. > > andy > >