[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs/Human perception

To: "Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com" <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
From: Mark Hamburg <mark@grubmah.com>
Subject: Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs/Human perception
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 09:24:54 -0800

On Feb 9, 2013, at 12:52 AM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

> ..but we know for certain that 128 increments is inadequate a lot
> of the time.

It could be that the problem has to do with how the 128 increments are 
distributed. If they are linear but human hearing is logarithmic, a lot of 
the increments will be in the wrong places.

Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs/Human perception
  - From: Rick Walker <looppool@cruzio.com>

References:
- Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs
  - From: Kevin Cheli-Colando <billowhead@gmail.com>
- Re: Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs
  - From: Rick Walker <looppool@cruzio.com>
- Re: Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs
  - From: Steven Clements <sdclements@gmail.com>
- Re: Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs
  - From: Steven Clements <sdclements@gmail.com>
- Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs/Human perception
  - From: andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: FCB1010 with UNO Chip strange behaviour.
Next by Date: Re: PREPARING INSTRUMENTS for LOOPING (and any other performance)
Previous by Thread: Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs/Human perception
Next by Thread: Re: Re: Realistic drum programming/recording for songs/Human perception
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author