Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Ah, I was thinking in a practical way, "just get what we need done," not in a philosophical one. :)
Lindsey
I've been thinking "Cut And Splice" would be quite descriptive for
this processing.
...
Greetings from Sweden
Per Boysen
www.perboysen.com
http://www.youtube.com/perboysen
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Philip Clevenger
<phil.clevenger@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lindsey,
>
> Think of it more like an xacto knife and some splicing tape. The feature
> would take the knife and make two cuts, remove some small section of
> content; then the algorithm (the splicing tape) would join the two remaining
> ends from which the piece was removed.
>
> So the thing that prevents the removed pieces from getting play time would
> be the fact that they are simply no longer there to be played :)
>
> Now… what does this do to loop windowing? ;)
>
> P
>
> On Nov 1, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Lindsey Walker <lindsey.walker@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm still thinking square waves but now with a low pass filter. Isn't that
> the whatchacallit that would prevent the removed pieces from getting play
> time?
>
> Lindsey
>
> On Nov 1, 2013 11:43 AM, "Matthias Grob" <matilists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> hahaha, unfortunately its not quite correct, since its not similar to
>> undo, no backward but forward movement
>>
>> so you did not like Disect? that would be rather precise, no?
>> Cutaway? Cutout?
>>
>> OWN a word? I'd rather own "brother-sync" but that would be screamingly
>> absurd :-)
>>
>> On 1.Nov2013, at 3:19 PM, Philip Clevenger <phil.clevenger@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Unsert! Unsert! Own that new word, let's see it in the 2014 Oxford
>> > Dictionary...
>> >
>> > I unsist...
>> >
>> > Phil :)
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> >> On Nov 1, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Matthias Grob <matilists@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 1.Nov2013, at 2:27 PM, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>>>> On 10/29/2013 4:59 PM, Phil Clevenger wrote:
>> >>>>>> But let's say I want to remove the tiniest bits of time from a
>> >>>>>> loop, at any point I so desire, for the length of a switchpress ("Remove
>> >>>>>> SUS"?)...
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Matthias Grob <matilists@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> yes!
>> >>>> even I would be using this :-)
>> >>>> Unsert? Desert? or just Cut ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Uncertain, Cut off in the Desert... having no idea what to call this
>> >>> function. Hm... what about "annihilate"? Thats what it does -
>> >>> annihilates a slice inside the loop and remakes the loop as if that
>> >>> slice has never existed.
>> >>
>> >> disagree, nihil=nothing and we only cut a bit.
>> >> Desect? Cutout?
>> >>>
>> >>>> and where would it go in the user interface? another Insert option?
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd prefer a direct MIDI call, to not block any other function you
>> >>> might want the insert button for (in case your question was put in
>> >>> EDP-ish). Wouldn't people want to have Insert and Annihilate laid out
>> >>> on two different pedal switches in order to really go creative with
>> >>> it?
>> >>
>> >> sure, direct MIDI inevitably, as all the other Insert button functions
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> we could start a statistic in Livelooping.org where users click what
>> >>>> tool they use and what functions in it
>> >>>
>> >>> Excellent idea! I have not checked but there must be useful Poll
>> >>> plugins for this in wordpress.
>> >>>
>> >>> ...
>> >>> Greetings from Sweden
>> >>>
>> >>> Per Boysen
>> >>> www.perboysen.com
>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/perboysen
>> >>
>> >
>>
>