Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Looper Ergonomics for Sync

my dream is that any track can be master
and when a track is meant to become slave, it can be defined slave of any 
other track
this allows to establish a new rhythm out of a lost-in-space-rhythm

so the assignment would not be master/synced/unsynced
but synced to xxx (being that xxx can be another track, another loop unit, 
or nothing)

On 16.Jan, 2014, at 6:23 PM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 16/01/2014 16:57, Per Boysen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> 
>> wrote:
>>> In a multitrack situation it's clearly makes sense
>>> to be able to assign master/synced/unsynced to each loop in this way.
>> 
>> 
>> Yes indeed! Sync properties are in fact assigned to the track, not to
>> the loop. And then the track may host many loops that will all follow
>> that track's sync setting.
> 
> well...I'm certainly not going to argue with that
> 
> :-)
> 
> andy
> 
> 
>> 
>> Greetings from Sweden
>> 
>> Per Boysen
>> www.perboysen.com
>> http://www.youtube.com/perboysen
>> 
>> 
>