Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Hasn't Bob been posting on the Looperlative Facebook page lately that he is working on a 2.0 version for LP1 ? Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 25, 2014, at 11:39 AM, cpr@musetrap.com wrote: > > All of my attention is on another project, so i definitely don't have > any time for this. It seems that 3/4 is the barrier to working on this, > as without this, one always chances a bricked LP1. otoh, I worked on Lp1 > code for several months, and never bricked my unit. > > Andy, could you post a link to where you got the 'hackfin', doing a > google search has resulted in 0 relevant results. > > -cpr > > Quoting andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>: > >> hi Rob, >> before doing this Bob took some time to talk me through >> about half the skills i'd need to work the LP1 software. >> (being persuaded by Rick Walker) >> >> It's all Linux based, not something I'm familiar with. >> There's a matter of how to fix things if the Lp1 >> becomes unable to respond to updates due to programming >> error, something that Bob told me was practically inevitable. >> This requires a bit of hardware called a "Hackfin" (which I purchased) >> and the knowledge what to do with it ( no idea). >> >> So we're looking for individuals with >> >> 1) LP1 hardware >> 2) Linux skills >> 3) Hackfin device >> 4) Hackfin knowledge >> 5) Motivation >> 6) GitHub skills >> >> out of which I only have 1,3,5, and just about enough 2 to compile if I >> go back to my notes. >> >> >> Anyone else out there? >> >> andy >> ps, >> Bob really genuinely seems to not have the free time available, >> he's doing all he can. >> To be honest, I don't always have the spare time either, >> but I do get windows of opportunity. >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 25/02/2014 06:31, Rob Campbell wrote: >>> 9 months later... >>> >>> I was wondering if the LP-1 'community' would benefit from this >>> decision. It doesn't seem like anybody is taking this and running >>> with it. >>> >>> I can't even tell what version this is on Github. I poked through the >>> source, but found no hints. Is this the long awaited but never >>> released 1.40 ? >>> >>> any unlikely news on this topic is welcome, thanks >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 6/9/2013 12:15 AM, David Lamkins wrote: >>>> I was just doing my weekly check of the Looperlative board, only to >>>> find it no longer responding. I backtracked to the top of the domain, >>>> and found this: >>>> >>>> "Looperlative the maker of the most advanced hardware looper on the >>>> market is going through a redesign. Please forgive this interruption >>>> of service but it is necessary to get caught up with commitments to >>>> all of our existing customers. Looperlative will once again sell >>>> advanced loopers after all existing commitments are satisfied. >>>> >>>> Looperlative is also announcing the release of the LP1 firmware >>>> source code as open source. We are now providing a snapshot of the >>>> sources as of June 1, 2013 to the open source community. You are >>>> welcome to modify and redistribute, but we have placed under the GNU >>>> Public License version 2. This simply means that if you distribute a >>>> binary of any of our code, you must offer our source code and your >>>> modifications of our source code to the public. Commercial entities >>>> are welcome to contact us for proprietary licensing contracts. >>>> >>>> The LP1 source code is now officially available at: >>>> https://github.com/looperlative <http://github.com/looperlative>" > >