Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
what about having bits of Rick Walker's http://www.livelooping.org/history_concepts/ page? if he's ok with it? On 24 mars 2014, at 12:33, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > Mark F says > >>> I for one would NOT be up for the job. > > me neither, don't think I'm indepedant enough. > >>> However the more general "Loop" aricle that Tyler cited >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loop_(music) is quite ok. Despite SOME >>> additions, and a few more examples, it could be that the Live Looping >>> page should just be deleted and redirected to tis one. >>> >>> Mark > > Well, if we have a *reference* to support the idea that live-looping > is some kind of art form in it's own right then surely > it can have it's own page. > > But what exactly qualifies as a reference? > > > I learned a bit from that article. > Standard way to spam wikipedia for self promotion is to write > bits of biog then do a bogus reference which is actually one of your > youtube vids. > Then it it *looks* like you're playing fair with wikipedia. > > > > andy > > > > >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Z <zzz@zzz.ch <mailto:zzz@zzz.ch>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello all! >>> Some guy or admin decided to decimate the wikipedia page on >>> livelooping. I tried to undo his changes but with no success, says >>> there needs to be more 'references'... It might be a good time for >>> those of us who'd be eager to share their stories to rebuild it? It >>> totally is lame right now.. >>> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_looping >>> Cheers >>> :) >>> z >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> /_Mark Francombe_/ >>> www.markfrancombe.com <http://www.markfrancombe.com/> >>> www.ordoabkhao.com <http://www.ordoabkhao.com/> >>> http://vimeo.com/user825094 >>> http://www.looop.no <http://www.looop.no/> >>> twitter @markfrancombe >