[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: "Repetition defines music"

To: "loopers-delight@loopers-delight.com" <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
From: Todd Elliott <toddbert@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "Repetition defines music"
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:52:17 -0700

I enjoy commenting on things with great vitriol without reading the thread, too!

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Kris Hartung <krispen.hartung@gmail.com> wrote:

I’m so behind on this thread, but the whole title makes me want to vomit. What’s the basis for forwarding such absolutist based questions or statements? Have we not learned anything about the history and philosophy of art? Since when can art be confined and constrained by absolutist principles? Seems to me that repetition is neither sufficient nor necessary in defining music.

http://alisongmadrigal.bandcamp.com

http://toaster.bandcamp.com

References:
- "Repetition defines music"
  - From: Jenko Nashorn <jenko.nashorn@gmail.com>
- RE: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: <mike@michaelplishka.com>
- Re: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: Ed Durbrow <edurbrow@gmail.com>
- RE: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: <mike@michaelplishka.com>
- Re: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: Stefan Tiedje <stefantiedje@googlemail.com>
- Re: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: michael noble <looplog@gmail.com>
- Re: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>
- Re: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: michael noble <looplog@gmail.com>
- Re: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: Sylvain Poitras <sylvain.trombone@gmail.com>
- RE: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: <mike@michaelplishka.com>
- Re: "Repetition defines music"
  - From: "Kris Hartung" <krispen.hartung@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: "Repetition defines music"
Next by Date: RE: "Repetition defines music"
Previous by Thread: Re: "Repetition defines music"
Next by Thread: RE: "Repetition defines music"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author