Support |
I haven't heard the track yet, so I can't comment on that directly. But Reverend Bob does bring up an interesting point. It seems to be mixed among musicians- some feel a drum machine really adds to a live performance, others think it is distracting and superfluous. Personally, I don't particularly like them used live- I am more likely to bring a hand percussionist along on those types of gigs, or play solo and force some creative rearranging. Any other opinions? How about from an audience member's point of view? ** interesting questions. having done a fair amount of live improv gigs with drums machines back in the 80s (dating meself now boy) . . . in my view it comes down to how you use the damn thing. if you try to use it as an instrument rather than just a time/groove keeper, i think that you're better served. one thing that we used to do (we had two-three machines for each gig) was have one being the groove machine and another being texture - - for instance, i'd crank up the tempo on mine (these weren't sinced together) and turn off everything but the cymbal/highhat sounds, instant textural wash. bring it in an dout as the piece progresses. another thing is bringing in different parts of any one groove in at different times. still another was starting and stopping the machine and letting stuff happen without any groove and then slamming back into the groove that you had left behind. they require a lot of attention! when they just sit in the "on" position without any sort of manipulation is when they are deadly dull. the biggest problem with using them (at all really, not just live) is that they're rather static and won't go into uncharted territory - - ever. of course ask any drummer to play the same damn thing for a long time and you could be sunk. i've heard 'em used well and heard 'em used poorly . . . sometimes in the same set (some of the tapes i have of those 80s gigs). . . . so, i guess that i feel that it's like any piece of tech - - it's how you use it. stig