Support |
I don't recall seeing them mentioned in this thread, so I will: What about a Sherman Filterbank? Or perhaps a few of Paul Perry's various Frostwave pedals? Just a thought. on 10/23/01 3:51 PM, Mark Sottilaro at sine@zerocrossing.net wrote: > why process when you can go synth? I'm totally loving my Roland GR-30. >It's > sounds aren't that exciting, but when configured correctly (If you don't >make > sure your pitchbend range are the same on both units it will track like >hell), > it will control any midi sound source. The GR-33 is supposed to be even > better. It tracks great on my Steinburger. I ran one of my favorite >synth > pad > sounds through one of the "synth" patches on my SpaceStation at the last >gig > we > played and IT WAS THICK. > > Paolo Valladolid wrote: > >> I checked out the audio demos at http://www.chicipick.com and I rather >liked >> them myself. >> >> Most of them featured a Nord MicroModular processing guitar audio while >> receiving what I'm guessing to be MIDI note on, note off, and envelope >data >> from the Chicipick system. A few also featured a Moog, receiving >control >> voltage signals from Chicipick. >> >> Paolo >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > For cheap, a good fuzz and a volume and or wah pedal do in a pinch. > > Mark Sottilaro > > Paolo Valladolid wrote: > >> I checked out the audio demos at http://www.chicipick.com and I rather >liked >> them myself. >> >> Most of them featured a Nord MicroModular processing guitar audio while >> receiving what I'm guessing to be MIDI note on, note off, and envelope >data >> from the Chicipick system. A few also featured a Moog, receiving >control >> voltage signals from Chicipick. >> >> Paolo >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >