Support |
perhaps you should consider running your memman in series with a higher-fidelity digital (set 100% wet) you might be able to then get the "mushtone" and the longer times. note - the feedback loop will have to be externalized but this is easily donw through a mixer From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net> Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: Re: long analog delay Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) Received: from mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.47]) by mc7-s12.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:55:15 -0800 Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:55:15 -0800 Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA08047;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:39 -0500 Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:39 -0500 Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net> In-Reply-To: <F165RhQdOgl4rhYQYx300009cca@hotmail.com> Message-Id: <1E047D91-2E54-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543) Resent-Message-ID: <YLw_6B.A.q9B.fMxL-@hemlock.violacea.com> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> archive/latest/29018 X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 21:55:15.0320 (UTC) FILETIME=[F20A3780:01C2C260] can you add another bucket brigade to a memory man? is there a tech who will do this? On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 04:45 PM, James Winger wrote: >DOD had one (FX96) at about 500ms. It used a single 3005. > >Funny thing, I had one and would run it on this really poorly regulated >supply...it must have altered the clock as it would pump out delays of >well >over a second >Note : what came out was very weird, it was an echo -- but it was very >distorted (not overdrive / clipping distorted or simply low-frequency >from >the slow clock) > >you've got a couple of options I guess - chain 2 BBD's together (you'll >get >some loss from twice the buckets) > >lower the clock speed (changes sampling rate and will restrict the >frequency response, it might also start sounding "grainy") > > > > > >From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net> >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >Subject: long analog delay >Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) >Received: from mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.17]) by >mc7-s14.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 >Jan >2003 12:44:30 -0800 >Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by >mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 >Jan >2003 12:44:29 -0800 >Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id >PAA31711;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 >Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 >Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net> >In-Reply-To: <00b301c2c257$f50f5040$69894682@lance> >Message-Id: <3BB51D2C-2E4A-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net> >X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543) >Resent-Message-ID: <88HQbC.A.ZvH.PKwL-@hemlock.violacea.com> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> archive/latest/29008 >X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com >Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 20:44:29.0984 (UTC) >FILETIME=[0F9F5A00:01C2C257] > >does anyone know of a longish (850 ms +) analog delay? i'm thinking >about >trying to have the memory modified to go twice as long.. just curious. >i'm >of course leaving out the highly regarded but insanely priced EH 16sec >delay. 1 second would be enough for me. i have the ubiquitous DL4 and >although i do like it, the memory man is the least realistic of all the >delays IMHO... > > >thanks > > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail