Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Mr Monk Here is a quick and dirty of a system that should give you (memory man) tones with longer delay times. Note : it's not ESSENTIAL to have the mixes at 100% - but for test purposes it's good. Remember that the only real essential is to have the FBACK of both delays at 0% (it won't hurt anything to have it higher, but you'll get a multitap sound - if you just want simple delays keep them at zero) The number of echos will now be controlled through the mixer and remember, if you want dry signal THROUGH the delays (as opposed to on another channel) BOTH mixes will have to be upped Here is a sample config through a mixer Mixer Aux A --> Analog Delay Input Analog Delay Output ---> digital delay Input Digital Delay Output ----> channel 1 input Channel 1's Aux A feed will control your regen (number of echos) To add the effect to any channel, simply feed to Aux A Channel 1's LEVEL will control eho volume Note : this assumes your aux is prefade From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net> Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: Re: long analog delay Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) Received: from mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.47]) by mc7-s12.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:55:15 -0800 Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by mc7-f40.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:55:15 -0800 Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA08047;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:39 -0500 Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:54:39 -0500 Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net> In-Reply-To: <F165RhQdOgl4rhYQYx300009cca@hotmail.com> Message-Id: <1E047D91-2E54-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543) Resent-Message-ID: <YLw_6B.A.q9B.fMxL-@hemlock.violacea.com> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> archive/latest/29018 X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 21:55:15.0320 (UTC) FILETIME=[F20A3780:01C2C260] can you add another bucket brigade to a memory man? is there a tech who will do this? On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 04:45 PM, James Winger wrote: >DOD had one (FX96) at about 500ms. It used a single 3005. > >Funny thing, I had one and would run it on this really poorly regulated >supply...it must have altered the clock as it would pump out delays of >well >over a second >Note : what came out was very weird, it was an echo -- but it was very >distorted (not overdrive / clipping distorted or simply low-frequency >from >the slow clock) > >you've got a couple of options I guess - chain 2 BBD's together (you'll >get >some loss from twice the buckets) > >lower the clock speed (changes sampling rate and will restrict the >frequency response, it might also start sounding "grainy") > > > > > >From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net> >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >Subject: long analog delay >Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) >Received: from mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.17]) by >mc7-s14.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 >Jan >2003 12:44:30 -0800 >Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by >mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 >Jan >2003 12:44:29 -0800 >Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id >PAA31711;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 >Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 >Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net> >In-Reply-To: <00b301c2c257$f50f5040$69894682@lance> >Message-Id: <3BB51D2C-2E4A-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net> >X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543) >Resent-Message-ID: <88HQbC.A.ZvH.PKwL-@hemlock.violacea.com> >Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> archive/latest/29008 >X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >Precedence: list >Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com >Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 20:44:29.0984 (UTC) >FILETIME=[0F9F5A00:01C2C257] > >does anyone know of a longish (850 ms +) analog delay? i'm thinking >about >trying to have the memory modified to go twice as long.. just curious. >i'm >of course leaving out the highly regarded but insanely priced EH 16sec >delay. 1 second would be enough for me. i have the ubiquitous DL4 and >although i do like it, the memory man is the least realistic of all the >delays IMHO... > > >thanks > > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
