Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Are you guys talking about something like this: http://www.loooper.com/ I was attracted to the name when doing some kind of a search on Harmony Central awhile back, thinking it might be loop related (it's not, just a device that does stomp box effects loops). Pretty cool. Greg --- Goddess <thefates@earthlink.net> wrote: > A dear friend is actually working on something very similar to this for > me at the moment. If there's an interest, he's talked about making more >of > them. What we're looking at now, is actually quite basic, and will > probably have a stereo pair of inputs, which would then split, and be > passed through the device, but also be summed to mono before being output > to my echoplex, whose output, would then be input back into the device, >to > be mixed with the stereo pair again. There will probably be a mix knob >as > well. Basically, it'll just be a lil' tiny box with ins, outs, and a >knob, > with the proper impedance and OP amps taken into account. Obviously, > the same can be accomplished with a standard mixer, but this is really > quick and easy and LITTLE! woohoo! lol! -if anyone is interested, >feel > free to write me off-list, K? > > Smiles, > > CQ > > At 07:33 PM 2/11/03 -0800, you wrote: > >Hmm...I see the signal chain you're getting at. Although, I'm not >exactly > >sure how to mix the loop from the post-looper Y with the pre-looper >direct > >signal going to the amp. In any event, this sounds like it would >involve > >three A/B/A+B boxes ($$$). If not using A/B/A+B boxes, wouldn't a >bunch of > >Y-cables create weird impedence issues (like when you plug two guitars >into > >hi and lo inputs on a single guitar amp, their volume controls affect >the > >volume of one another)? > > > >-J > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Daryl" <highhorse@mhorse.com> > >To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:07 PM > >Subject: Re: looping as a profession > > > > > >> > >> Jesse, would it work to have a splitter box before your looper, >sending > >one side > >> to your own amp, and sending the other to the looper with the mix for >the > >loops > >> set at 100% wet? (I don't own an EDP, but I assume this is >controllable > >> universally.) Then split the signal coming from the looper too, >sending it > >to > >> your own rig to mix with the dry, and sending only the wet to everyone > >else. > >> You could also click the output to your bandmates on and off this way. > >> > >> I use a splitter myself so I can have an uncolored dry sound that >doesn't > >go > >> thru my looping stuff. Plus, it's a safety device; if the complicated > >stuff > >> breaks down at least I can keep making noise! > >> > >> These examples of folks making all or some part of their living doing > >music is > >> highly inspiring! > >> > >> Daryl Shawn > >> highhorse@mhorse.com > >> > >> > >> > I have tried using loops on some rock and funk gigs, but when > >playing > >> > with other musicians monitoring is the biggest problem. It would be > >nice if > >> > my looping devices (a Boss RC-20, and now an EDP) had a dedicated >"Loop > >Out" > >> > output, which would just output the loops, and no direct signal. >This > >way, > >> > if the drummer suddenly gets bass in his monitor he knows it's a >loop > >and > >> > that he has to follow it. > >> > > > > > > > --- > > "The only things I really think are important, are love, and eachother. > -Then, anything is possible..." > > http://home.earthlink.net/~thefates > > Please visit BadFiction and The Guitar Cafe. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/badfiction > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the-guitar-cafe > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com