Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
You people are ridiculous. Have you ever tried to loop a stereo source? Trust me. I had an EDP. I had a JamMan. You take that rich stereo chorus and turn it into a mono loop and its like you put a finger in one ear. It made a big enough of a difference to me to ditch those loopers and go for a Repeater. Playing live where most PA systems are mono, of course it doesn't make a difference. However doing what I do in a studio make a huge difference. Why don't you guys just pan your home stereo system all the way to one side and get rid of that silly extra speaker? You don't need it. I also never said, or meant to say the EDP wasn't worth it because it wasn't software. I'm just looking at other piece of gear that I have and making price comparisons. If I were to do the EDP in stereo it would set me back $1600 (+$100 if I went with a dedicated pedal) which would put it way out in front as the most expensive piece of dedicated audio gear I have by FAR. I know when I see Mark Hamburg's name every time I start Photoshop, I can imagine that his salary trounces mine by a factor I'd rather not think about. (I do think he's worth it, as Photoshop is an amazing tool, but I digress) So, $1600 is probably nothing in his world. However, $1600 to the average musician is a lot, and I know it keeps a lot of people away from the EDP. (as does it's single $800 price-tag) ...and why are people concerned with what I want? I actually have an excellent stereo looper that more or less does most of what I want. I'm just speculating a bit. Thinking that the little "DJ" rig I'm putting together would be even cooler if I could incorporate some live looping and not have to add another piece of hardware. Mark Sottilaro On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 12:02 PM, wavelet wrote: