Support |
> version, without luck. Finally Doug came along a few months ago and it > seemed like we might finally get somewhere. It slowed down a lot though > because I was too busy at the time to keep up with it. At the moment I have To be fair, it looks like you gave me the go-ahead, and I kinda let it fall. :\ It was obviously a busy time for both of us! Really not trying to be a butt-insky here. I also have some time for this right now, and wanted to help get to a solution quickly while I do, since there was some groundwork in place. So I thought I'd comment on some of Kim's points: > Some key initial points: > - I'm going to require that the current profile data be maintained. It is > fine to remove the completely dead entries, but there is too much good > stuff there to throw it away. It takes a long time to build something >like > that. Many people like having their entries on the page, even if they > haven't been around the list for years or have never been on the list at > all. They still come back to the profiles and update them once in a >while. > I don't want to lose that data. Asking on the list for people to send you > info will only get a tiny fraction of the LD community to respond. Absolutely agree. We can (hmmm... fairly) easily import that data into a MySQL database on LD, and use it for a new system (the one I have demoed right now would use it, for instance). > - It's great if you and Doug can help out with administering the section. > In the end though, I know from hard experience that I am the one who will > likely be maintaining it. So the management aspects of the page have to >be > something that works for me. Among those: there cannot be human > intervention required for people to create their entries and make >updates. > That has to be something people do themselves. The administration aspect > should be a higher level of fixing occasional problems or some >maintenance > here and there. Makes sense. We can set it up to let entries/changes immediately show up. I assume you'd also be in favor of at least trying out the delegation of admin duties, so that any clean up *could* be done by Greg or me or someone else? Regarding updates: although you can't see it in the demo right now, we can set it up to allow password protected editing of any entry. Doug