Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Same question asked YET AGAIN.. can someone help me in MY situation?



Because I didn't want my signal compressed.  Plus, the Vortex is hissy 
enough as is without adding a compressor to the party.  And, much of 
the fun of the Vortex comes from the patches where the input volume 
dynamically controls some other parameter.  Compressing your input 
dynamics would defeat much of that feature.

TH


On Dec 18, 2004, at 8:07 AM, 
Loopers-Delight-d-request@loopers-delight.com wrote:

> From: "Krispen Hartung" <info@krispenhartung.com>
> Date: December 17, 2004 3:59:23 PM PST
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Subject: RE: Same question asked YET AGAIN.. can someone help me in MY 
> situation?
>
>
> Why don't you all just get a decent rackmount compressor to stablize
> your signal? Put it before everything or in front of whatever is the
> most sensitive. I find this to be a must with looping because of the db
> change in adding loops.  Of course, I play the acoustic guitar too,
> which has a whole different dynamic.
>
> Kris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Travis Hartnett [mailto:tiktok@sprintmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:38 PM
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: Same question asked YET AGAIN.. can someone help me in MY
> situation?
>
>
> Both of the Vortices I've used have been pretty picky about input
> levels.  The level range between "acceptable" and "overload" seemed to
> be much narrower than the spread between my rhythm and lead levels
> (this was on electric guitar, using the amp effects loop).  I resigned
> myself to dedicating a box to one or the other patch.
>
> TravisH
>