Support |
mark sottilaro wrote: > That does indeed sound like a Repeater/EDP killer! The LP1 does indeed sound like a very promising product. But before we sound the death knell for the EDP we need to consider the issue of "software". There is an acronym in the world of engineering, SMOP, which stands for "Simple Matter Of Programming". It refers to the tendency of engineers to underestimate the costs of software development and testing when doing project planning. As in, "we'll budget 6 months for hardware checkout, then it's just a SMOP for the OS". I'm sure Bob's a fine engineer, and I look forward to watching the evolution of the LP1, but do not underestimate the difficulty of writing and testing software for a machine such as this, and the complexity of the software that has been refined over many years in the EDP. From the little information that exists, the LP1 has already begun departing from the software architecture of the EDP in several significant ways, and as such, I seriously doubt the LP1 will ever do everything an EDP can. I'm not saying it should, it will have unique and powerful features of its own, but it will be different, and these differences will be important to some people. Jeff