Support |
Oh so correct. When I read, "MIDI Sync is at the top of the list" I read it like, "NASA's next mission is a manned mission to Mars." MIDI sync seems to be quite the gauntlet for looping devices. Although I understand little of the programming that goes into a device like the Repeater or EDP, MIDI sync always seems to be the thing that's the most difficult. I guess we can only wait and see. Mark --- Jeff Larson <Jeffrey.Larson@Sun.COM> wrote: > mark sottilaro wrote: > > That does indeed sound like a Repeater/EDP > killer! > > The LP1 does indeed sound like a very promising > product. But before > we sound the death knell for the EDP we need to > consider the issue of > "software". > > There is an acronym in the world of engineering, > SMOP, which stands > for "Simple Matter Of Programming". It refers to > the tendency of > engineers to underestimate the costs of software > development and > testing when doing project planning. As in, "we'll > budget 6 months > for hardware checkout, then it's just a SMOP for the > OS". > > I'm sure Bob's a fine engineer, and I look forward > to watching the > evolution of the LP1, but do not underestimate the > difficulty of > writing and testing software for a machine such as > this, and the > complexity of the software that has been refined > over many years in > the EDP. > > From the little information that exists, the LP1 > has already begun > departing from the software architecture of the EDP > in several significant > ways, and as such, I seriously doubt the LP1 will > ever do everything > an EDP can. I'm not saying it should, it will have > unique and powerful > features of its own, but it will be different, and > these differences > will be important to some people. > > Jeff > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com