Support |
On 22 jun 2006, at 21.33, Todd Reynolds wrote: > Thanks to both of you. It's perfectly clear. > > I've just been trying to find a better way to use multiple ouputs > in live > without bussing through return tracks.... Sorry, have to add a short comment here: I actually like using the Return Tracks for that. The reason is that this opens up for bringing those (physical output transfer) Return Tracks also as Audio Track inputs for the purpose of doing real-time live recording of separate outputs, tracks or submixes of tracks. Bernhard and I did that last year in Zürich and we were able to also incorporate a stereo track of his entire looping rig as an input on one Live Track. If you do that, just remember to delete all clip slots on the recording tracks for all scenes you are using in Live to trigger anything. Or you will by accident stop the recording. Another good thing to know is that any track in live can use the output setting "Sends Only". This means that whatever you rout through that track is not sent to the master channel and by the Aux Send knobs you have full control over how much of the signal to send to each Return Track. And then you have the freedom to route those Return Tracks anywhere - heck , you may even route a Return Track's output back into itself! (do that through a delay set to no direct signal, only "wet", so you won't cause digital audio feedback. Makes for a great dub delay set-up) > To my knowledge there is no better way than that... I thought that > perhaps > it should be possible to have the input for an audio track be the > master > out, but I guess that is avoided because of the obvious chaos which > could > ensue if that routing was mismanaged. Correct! N00bs would melt down their sound cards and American Lawyers would be suing Ableton all day because there were no warning sticker on the product's package cover ;-) Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.boysen.se (Swedish) www.looproom.com (international) http://tinyurl.com/fauvm (podcast) http://www.myspace.com/looproom