Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: definition looper

Indeed. Good question.

And, is the grass always greener on the other side?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "andy butler" <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: definition looper


> and the Pope?
>
> Travis Hartnett wrote:
>> [1] No, you have to use looping in your music to be considered a 
>looping 
>> musician, not vice versa.
>> [2] No.
>> [3] As long as he satisfies [1], he is a looping musician.  The 
>presence 
>> of an audience qualifies you as a performing musician.  Playing music 
>> qualifies you as a musician.
>>
>>
>> TH
>>
>> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Bob Amstadt <bobld@amstadt.com 
>> <mailto:bobld@amstadt.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     [1] Do you have to be a "looper" to use looping in your music?  [2]
>>     Do you have to perform in front of other people to be a looper? 
>> [3]Why can't the guy who plays music in his bedroom without ever
>>     getting in front of people be a looper?
>>
>>
>
>
>