Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: definition looper



and the Pope?

Travis Hartnett wrote:
> [1] No, you have to use looping in your music to be considered a looping 
> musician, not vice versa.
> [2] No.
> [3] As long as he satisfies [1], he is a looping musician.  The presence 
> of an audience qualifies you as a performing musician.  Playing music 
> qualifies you as a musician.
> 
> 
> TH
> 
> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Bob Amstadt <bobld@amstadt.com 
> <mailto:bobld@amstadt.com>> wrote:
> 
>     [1] Do you have to be a "looper" to use looping in your music?  [2]
>     Do you have to perform in front of other people to be a looper? 
>     [3]Why can't the guy who plays music in his bedroom without ever
>     getting in front of people be a looper?
> 
>