Support |
Jeff Larson wrote: > [andy] >> You don't have to wait for the on-beat when recording with a synced EDP. > If I understand correctly, the EDP does a sort of "round off" at the > end rather than quantizing the beginning. You start recording > immediately and the ending is delayed to make the loop be an even > multiple of the beat/bar. yep, in EDP rounding is distinct from Quantize. Actually Quantize was implemented later. > I can see this being nice if you want to > start with lead in notes that sustain over the loop start point. The EDP was designed on the idea that a loop is cyclic, rather than a sample with a definite start/end. Quite likely the loop evolved into a rhythm, having started arhythmically, and the idea of a startpoint is then lost. So when a second EDP brother syncs to that it makes no sense to wait for startpoint. > If > that's correct wouldn't the loop technically be out of alignment with > the drum machine? Well, I guess so. but what's important is the alignment of the audio. > If you wanted to retrigger from the start you would > have to make another pass and set the loop start point to light up > with the drum machine's downbeat. but that assumes that the start of the music is on that big black bar line. > BTW, this seems like the same philosophical misunderstanding that > makes Mobius' unquantized remultiply suck out loud compared to the > EDP. I really got unquantized rounding wrong.... :-) Matthias' great invention, and us EDPers just use it without having to think. andy butler > >