Support |
Ricky Graham wrote:
Per, isn't this technique based on the mid-side (MS) recording method?
It's based on a standard circuit called a "shuffler", a simple matrix to convert fron Left<>Right stereo to Mid<>Side and back again. roughly:- M = L+R S = L-R giving you a mono signal plus "sides" (equivalent to a MS recording) then to convert back L = M+S R = M-S This way it's simple to see that if you vary the amplitude of S you can mess with the stereo width from 0 to regularto "enhanced". Also you get a chance to process the S in other ways if you like.
The reason Per's process seems more complicated is that a) It's meant to work within the limited routing capabilities
of a DAW.b) er...I dunnow really...Per's version seems to be more a way of making you listen harder. I wonder if the flipping of left
and right corresponds to the change from player to listener. ...but essentially it's the same trick, and it *does* keep mono compatibility. To make a regular shuffler in a DAW by a similar process to Per's (and this is something I've learned from the discussion here) Create 3 versions of the mix (2 channel) A unchanged B reverse channels L<>R and invert both C mono on both channels Next mix A and B equally, to give you the "sides" channel. (that's different to Per's approach) Now starting from C and mixing in the "sides" channel you get a shuffler, exactly the same as varying the amplitude of S. Again you have the chance to to do stuff with that A+B mix, for instance if you were mixing for vinyl you'd maybe cut the bass on it. andy