Support |
no, this particular amp is not my taste either. the first half was the amp, second half was the axe fx. i also agree that mildly overdriven tones are the ones that are hardest to capture. i was trying to find a wonderful clip that someone did of the "buttery" sim that covered clean to breakup and sounded fantastic, but he's removed it now. i don't think the axe fx has any problems reproducing these kind of tones. the AC30 sim is especially lovely - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnvAxF1Zm1k&feature=channel&list=UL On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:25 AM, William Walker <billwalker@baymoon.com> wrote: > Ok you convinced me, I don't want to buy the amp either :-) the first > example sounds harsher to my ear with more noise floor, the second one > sounds gated and slighter smoother, unfortunately the tones are not my > aesthetic cup of tea. Where I find the modeling technology is most > obviously fake sounding is in the clean to mildly overdriven tones, where > the harshness in the high frequencies is more noticeable, the kind of > amps > that have wider dynamic range, more tactile response and are not overly > gain-y and compressed like these tones are. So I give up, which is which?