Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
stop sending me shit!!!!!!!! On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:53:16 -0500, Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain > > Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 00 : Issue >75 > > Today's Topics: > Not Interesting... [ "David Potter" <papadave55@hotmail. ] > Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #73 [ "Larry Tremblay" <ltct@concentric.n ] > Re: dl4 = midi [ "b.knox" <b.knox@latrobe.edu.au> ] > Re: dl4 = midi [ George Van Wagner <vanwag@earthlink ] > Re: dl4 = midi [ Rich <rich@nuvision.com> ] > Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #74 [ KRosser414@aol.com ] > Re: Interesting... [ dan mcmullen <dog@well.com> ] > Re: OT (or maybe not) National Endow [ Hawkeye255@aol.com ] > Re: re Ineresting... [ Hawkeye255@aol.com ] > Re: mpx1 vs. mpx 500 [ SoundFNR@aol.com ] > > Administrivia: > Looper's Delight > **************** > > Please send posts to: > > Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > > Don't send them to the digest! > > To subscribe/unsubscribe to the Loopers-Delight digest version, send email > with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body, with no > signature files, to: > > Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com > > > To subscribe/unsubscribe to the real Loopers-Delight list, send email > with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body, with no > signature files, to: > > Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com > > > Check the web page for archives and lots of other goodies! > > http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html > > > Your humble list maintainer, > > Kim Flint > kflint@annihilist.com > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 06:37:15 PST > From: "David Potter" <papadave55@hotmail.com> > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Not Interesting... > Message-ID: <20000310143715.42567.qmail@hotmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > > ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......................... > > >From: "Larry Tremblay" <ltct@concentric.net> > >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > >To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> > >Subject: Re: Interesting... > >Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 20:09:39 -0500 > > > > > > > > LOL. Yep, sure does. That was the point. I'm not *totally* > > > insulated from the irony of my own statements, you know. > > > > > > > > > ** okay. i guess the problem is that you come off that way . . . while > > > possibly not allowing others that latitude. > > > >I'm lightening up a bit. The slack it out. > > > > > True, there's no definitive "proof" per se, only shades of > >understanding, > > > given the complexity of the subject under study - the human brain. >;) > > > > > > ** or the universe? i think that it may be easier to understand the > >human > > > brain that it is the universe around us . . . > > > >Hard to say really. The brain is a 3-pound universe all its own. > >At least the universe is 'out there' for us to study, whereas the > >study of the brain is a seriously recursive [like looping] and > >unimaginably complex endeavor. Not uncrackable, but difficult, to > >say the least. > > > > > by the way, have you noticed how string theory seems to be approaching > >some > > > of the mystical traditions? i also seem to recall that many physicists > >have > > > been ardently religious . . . (not that i am, mind you) > > > >Yes, I've read and studied most of the literature on the subject of > >Super-string theory (or so-called 'theory of everything'), and it > >appears to approximate (at times) the mystical speculations of a > >'hidden reality' or 'other planes of existence'-type stuff. > > > >The jury is most definitely out on that one. The magnitude of the > >gulf between matter at the sub-atomic particle level versus what > >we experience our own macro-atomic (i.e., molecular) level is vast > >indeed. It's almost like two different worlds - and for all practical > >purposes, they are. > > > >As I understand it, quantum events have no "real" effect at the macro > >level due to the strong forces of the molecules that make up our bodies > >and the 'hard matter' world around us. Otherwise, things would be >flying > >apart all over the place. (Given there was a place to begin with.) > > > >True, *some* scientists are religious, but most are either agnostic or > >devote atheists like Carl Sagan and Einstein (despite his protests >about > >not believing that "God plays dice", in regards to Quantum Mechanics). > > > >The great thing about science versus religion is that the future is > >always open, and that all theories must continually hold up under > >intense scrutinity. On the otherhand, religion is a closed book, > >it's dogma rarely (if ever) open to questioning and revision. > > > >- Larry > > > > > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:43:19 -0500 > From: "Larry Tremblay" <ltct@concentric.net> > To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> > Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #73 > Message-ID: <002f01bf8a9e$fb792670$7c310140@concentric.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > There is no clash between thought and feeling, any apparent > > clash betwwen the two iis really a clash between two > > contradicting ideas. So, if you have a feeling that seems > > irrational, it's really your ideas that are irrational. > > Thanks Dan. I couldn't have said it better. Ayn Rand's > philosophy has had a great influence on my own thinking, > too. Her essay, "Art and Cognition" in her book "The > Romantic Manifesto" is what led me to Helmholtz, and > subsequently, a whole new world of music and aesthetics. > > - Larry > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Koontz" <DanKoontz@webtv.net> > To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 6:52 AM > Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #73 > > > > First of all, rationality and irrationality are mutually exclusive. >You > > either choose to validate your ideas (through a process of reason),and > > be rational; or choose to follow whatever makes you feel good and is > > conveniant. The senses (percepts) are valid, they are automatic > > reactions to the external world. Your senses never lie, the error occurs > > when a person takes percepts and forms incorrect (invalid) concepts. A > > good example of this would be the illusion of the broken-stick in water. > > The senses are totaly reliable in that they don't censor the light > > coming to your eyes at different speeds. I you were to conclude that the > > stick was really bent, that would be an error of thought (conceptual), > > not yor senses (perceptual). Love is not an "irrational feeling". Love, > > like all feelings or emotions are a value judgement formed by one's > > ideas. All emotions derive from the content of one's mind. If you won a > > million dollars, would you feel happy, or sad and dejected? You would > > feel happy, because those million dollars would be of value to you. > > There is no clash between thought and feeling, any apparent clash > > betwwen the two iis really a clash between two contradicting ideas. >So, > > if you have a feeling that seems irrational, it's really your ideas that > > are irrational. I strongly suggest you look into Objectivism, the > > philosophy of Ayn Rand. > > > > Cheers, - Dan > > > > > Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:44:11 +1100 > From: "b.knox" <b.knox@latrobe.edu.au> > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: dl4 = midi > Message-ID: <38C9184B.1E8D940D@latrobe.edu.au> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Dan Koontz wrote: > > > > I heard about someone thinking about modifying a dl4. A suggestion I > > would have is to try circuit-bending it. If you're not familiar with > > this, go to your favorite search engine and look up "Reed Ghazala", or > > "circuit bending". I've modified lots of cheap toys using this and >have > > come upon some amaaazing sounds! > > Hope this is could beof some value to you, > > - Dan > > hi Dan, > > on the subject on circuit bending ... just picked up a ye olde mattel(!) > synsonics drum machine ... molto fun as is, but has this been a cheap > toy you've bent? any pointers? > > lurv that white noise "cymbal" sound :) > > brad > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:58:21 -0800 > From: George Van Wagner <vanwag@earthlink.net> > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: dl4 = midi > Message-ID: <38C91B9B.F9EFA3B3@earthlink.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Remember that pretty much everything that's going on in the DL4 is > happening in the digital world, and the signal goes directly from the > DAC to the output op amp, so, as interesting as Reed's 'anti-theory' is, > I don't think you'll make much headway on this particular piece of gear. > > George > > Dan Koontz wrote: > > > > I heard about someone thinking about modifying a dl4. A suggestion I > > would have is to try circuit-bending it. If you're not familiar with > > this, go to your favorite search engine and look up "Reed Ghazala", or > > "circuit bending". I've modified lots of cheap toys using this and >have > > come upon some amaaazing sounds! > > Hope this is could beof some value to you, > > - Dan > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:06:35 -0800 > From: Rich <rich@nuvision.com> > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: dl4 = midi > Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20000310080635.008bea40@pop3.argotech.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I'm definitely not the guy to say yes or no to such a proposition, since i > am definitely an end 'user'. However, since Line6's POD, AX2 and (i > believe) the Flextone all have pretty good midi implementation, why >would > they not include midi capability to the DL4 if it was so easy? > Furthermore, you're suggesting that it would be easy to MODIFY the unit? > Sounds kinda fishy to me... > > For $250, my little green box works just fine... > > rich > > > At 05:33 PM 3/9/00 PST, you wrote: > > > >loopers ! > > > >i don't know if anyone did or not talked about the idea of modifying > >the dl4, but it sure sounds like a danm good idea. > >two main reasones: > > > >just before reading that please forgive me for my poor level and > >knoowledge in electronics...(i am doing my best thugh to keep up with > >it) > > > >1. > >the fact that the unit has so many tweekning and tweazing > >possibilites and also 3 presets and a tap makes a bit of a conflict... > >assuming the optimal situation in which you can take the maximum > >advantage of the unit's flexabiliety ; > > > >a. the units on the flore > >it seems like the 1 expression pedal output is limiting,so you can't > >make small adjustment while playing but us the pedal like you use the > >wah > >b. or it's on a table so in order to tweek,you must stop stop playing. > > > >2.midi clock both in loop and delay mode > > > >basicly we're just talking about converting swiches and potentiometers > >to midi,shouldnt be so hard ... > > > >for the quality of the delay and other effects it may be interesting > >to go even further and assign different alogarithem to control > >velocities and other characters normaly being tweeked. > > > >i think about a kind of seperated midi agent device that converts > >midi clock to on＼off and alogarithems＼signals to level (potentiometers) > >controls all these units. > >anyways, since midi technology is so accesible these days, > >it seems logical that there sould be some way to enable musican to > >convert their old analog devices to be controled vie digital interface. > >we're at the age of midi control. > >actualy its not a bad idea to start a kind of a business... > >like maybe do it yourself... > > > >-why wait for futher upgrades in the program if you can modify it > >by yourself? > >-why buy the modulation modeler if you can convert your analog devices > >to be controled via midi? > >-whats wrong in connecting analog technology with the opertunities of > >digital accurat control? > > > >looper, feel free to enrich use with your well appriciated knowlede, > >experience and ideas. > > > >am0as ;9)- > > > >______________________________________________________ > >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:07:59 EST > From: KRosser414@aol.com > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #74 > Message-ID: <ca.2a2ad0a.25fa77df@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > In a message dated 3/10/00 7:24:43 AM Pacific Standard Time, > Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com writes: > > << So, > if you have a feeling that seems irrational, it's really your ideas >that > are irrational. I strongly suggest you look into Objectivism, the > philosophy of Ayn Rand. >> > > I had plenty of psudeo-intellectual acquaintences in college, including >a > particularly irritating ex-girlfriend (so there's my subjective angle...), > that constantly trumpeted the philosophy and "genius" of Ayn Rand. >These > people all confused their ego with "rationality" and delighted on >sitting > around and stroking it ad nauseum. I gave it a shot, but I thought >then, and > think now, that it's not only utter garbage but intellectually >cowardly. I'm > not going to claim to have read everything by Ayn Rand, but I feel about it > like I feel about eating fried pork chops: if you like it and have no > trouble digesting it, good for you, but I didn't see the point in going any > further than one or two once my stomach was aching. > > If you get something meaningful from it, and I mean this sincerely, >more > power to you. But like the more over-zealous followers of any of these > religions you find so offensive, you're making a mistake if you think >it > applies to anyone's reality but your own. > > IMHO, of course, and as off-topic as ever, > Ken R > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:35:38 -0800 > From: dan mcmullen <dog@well.com> > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: Interesting... > Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000310083538.00b39970@mail.well.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > At 02:14 PM 3/10/00 +0000, johnmcc@aldiscon.ie wrote: > >[Larry:] > >> On the otherhand, religion is a closed book, it's dogma > >> rarely (if ever) open to questioning and revision. > > > >Yep, and a pity .. I've often felt that there may be more to be gained from > >understanding the questions than from the possible answer .. > > would it be more accurate to say "religion, *as often promoted by >western > religions instututions*, is a closed book"? i believe religion *can* (and > should?) be open to questioning and revision. > > thanks to all for their contributions to this fascinating thread, > dan > ___ > dan mcmullen, ca, usa don't worry - pay attention > mailto:dog@well.com 707-485-0220 > pgp fingerprint = 1C70 8D81 6B94 93A9 F2D8 9609 2122 BF70 8619 EDAF > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:45:48 EST > From: Hawkeye255@aol.com > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: OT (or maybe not) National Endowment of the Arts... > Message-ID: <92.26a31b5.25fa80bc@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Subject: NPR & PBS Funding > > On NPR's Morning Edition, Nina Totenberg reported that if the Supreme > Court supports Congress to cut the budget of the National Endowment of > the Arts, it is in effect the end of NEA. This situation creates great > concerns about Congressional funding for creative arts in America, >since > > NEA provides major support for NPR (National Public Radio), PBS (Public > Broadcasting System), and numerous other creative and performing arts. > If NEA is lost or weakened, our lives will be similarly diminished. In > spite of the efforts of each station to reduce spending costs and > streamline their services, some government officials believe that the > funding currently going to these programs is too large a portion of > funding for something which is seen as not worthwhile. > > Currently, taxes from the general public for PBS equal $1.12 per person > per year, and the National Endowment for the Arts equals $.64 a year. A > January 1995 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll indicated that 76% of Americans > wish to keep funding for PBS, third only to national defense and law > enforcement as the most valuable programs for federal funding. > > Please add your name to this list and forward it to friends that you > believe are in favor of what this stands for. The full list will be > forwarded to the President of the United States, the Vice President, >and > > the Speaker of the House, whose office has in the past been the > instigator of the action to cut funding to these worthwhile programs. > This petition is being passed around the Internet. Please add your name > to it so that funding can be maintained for the NEA, NPR, and PBS. > THIS IS OUR CHANCE TO MAKE INTERNET TECHNOLOGY WORK AS A VOICE IN OUR > DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM. IT'S EASIER THAN EVER TO MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD. > > Please keep the petition rolling. Do not reply to me. Sign your name >and > > locale to the list and forward it to others to sign. If you prefer not > to, please send the list to the email address given below. This is >being > > forwarded to numerous people at once to add their names to the >petition. > > It won't matter if many people receive the same list, as the names are > being managed. > > This is for anyone who thinks NPR and PBS deserve $1.12/year of their > taxes. If you sign, please forward the list to others. If not, please > don't kill it. If you happen to be the 150th, 200th, 250th, etc., >signer > > of this petition, please forward a copy to: > wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu This way we can keep track of the lists > and organize them. Forward this to everyone you know, and help us to > keep these programs alive. Thank you. > > IMPORTANT NOTE: It is preferable that you COPY the entirety of this > letter and then PASTE it into a NEW outgoing message, rather than >simply > > forwarding it. In your new outgoing message, add your name to the > bottom of the list, then send it on. Or, if the option is available, do > a SEND AGAIN. > > 1. David Liberman, Sylva, NC > 2. Marie Harrison, Sylva, NC > 3. Randi Beckmann, Ithaca, NY > 4. Bill Wertheim, Mt. Vernon, NY > 5. Marlene Wertheim, Mt. Vernon, NY > 6. George Wertheim, San Francisco, CA. > 7. Linda Wertheim, San Francisco, CA > 8. Linda R. Semi, Walnut Creek, CA > 9. Margaret C. Forness, Pleasant Hill, CA > 10. Phillip D. Rubenstein, Syracuse, NY > 11. Timothy J. Connell, Madison, WI > 12. Stacia E. Jesner, Mt. Kisco, NY > 13. Jenna Schnuer, NYC, NY > 14. Julia Kohn, NY, NY > 15. Maria Sarro, NY, NY > 16. Evan Schwartz, Cliffside Park, NJ > 17. Pat Waters, Lakewood, CO > 19. Karen Tilton, Maquoketa, IA > 20. Kent Crawford > 21. Terry Dillon > 22. Gene Bechen, Coralville, IA > 23. Neal Schnoor, Kearney, NE > 24. Sam Zitek, Crete, NE > 25. Jay Kloecker > 26. Marilyn Godby, Papillion, NE > 27. Lucina Johnson > 28. Alfred Tom Johnson > 29. Tyler Corey Johnson > 30. A. Corey Limbach > 31. Paula Smith, Berkeley, CA > 32. Pat Quinn, Alameda, CA > 33. Andrea Quinn, Alameda, CA > 34. Jerry Hackett, Berkeley, CA > 35. Richard Hackett, NY > 36. Jeffrey Green, CA > 37. Phil Chernin, CA > 38. Sandra S. Bauer, CA > 39. Gregory LeVasseur, San Francisco, CA > 40. Keiko LeVasseur, San Francisco, CA > 41. Diego Gonzalez, San Francisco, CA > 42. David D. Berkowitz, Washington, DC > 43. Peter Glass, Bellevue, WA > 44. Mary Frances Rimpini, Kent, WA > 45. Mary Frances Stevens, Kirkland, WA > 46. Linda Grebmeier, Benicia, CA > 47. Lee Altman, Benicia, CA > 48. Jeffrey Gray, South Orange, NJ > 49. Ed Jones, Orange, NJ > 50. Daniel P. Jones, Glenside, PA > 51. Jenifer Goetz, State College, PA > 52. Arnold R. Post, Carrboro, NC > 53. Anna E. Post, Carrboro, NC > 54. Robert A. Post, Cape May, NJ > 55. Evelyn M. Post, Cape May, NJ > 56. Jay A. Sklaroff, Philadelphia, PA > 57. Harry M. Sklaroff, Washington, DC > 58. Susan E. Salmons, Washington, DC > 59. Dori Langevin, Silver Spring, MD > 60. Ted Langevin, Silver Spring, MD > 61. David Mercier, Easton, MD > 62. Phoebe Harding, Baltimore, MD > 63. Molly Rath, Baltimore, MD > 64. Terry O'Hara, Baltimore, MD > 65. Nina Wendt, Baltimore, MD > 66. Marilyn Clark, Baltimore, MD > 67. Cathy McKinney, Boone, NC > 68. Harold McKinney, Boone, NC > 69. Milena Garcia, Columbia, MD > 70. Timothy Morrison, Devore, CA > 71. Virginia S. Kallay Cleveland, OH > 72. Nancy Cleaveland, Atlanta, GA > 73. Cindy Lutenbacher, Decatur, GA > 74. Kaye Norton, Columbus, OH > 75. Elaine Haidt, Chapel Hill, NC > 76. Frank Church, Chapel Hill, NC > 77. Astrid R. Jarzembowski, Garrison, NY > 78. David Church, Garrison, NY > 79. Cathy Dillon, Old Greenwich, CT > 80. Michelle Woodward, Town of Mt.Pleasant, NY > 81. Catherine L. Josset, Brewster, NY > 82. Bill Philbrick, Crompond, NY > 83. Emile Menasch=BB, Mahopac, NY > 84. Amy Menasch=BB, Mahopac, NY > 85. Bette-Jane Crigger, Peekskill, NY > 86. Miriam Piven Cotler > 87. Cyndi Menegaz, Los Angeles, CA > 88. Linda Zale, Los Angeles, CA > 89. Phillip Kudelka, Woodland Hills, California > 90. Karl Schoenbaum, Woodland Hills, California > 91. Jennifer Bramscher, Malibu, CA > 92. Mindy Markman, Los Angeles, CA > 93. Bekki Misiorowski, Los Angeles, CA > 94. Robert A. Misiorowski, Los Angeles, CA > 95. Elise B. Misiorowski, Los Angeles, CA > 96. Andrea McShane, Los Angeles, CA > 97. Judith Shechter > 98. Gerald Shechter, Kansas City, Missouri > 99. Joyce Williams, Kansas City, MO > 100. Brad Harris, Kansas City, MO > 101. Ken Krusi, Silverdale, WA. > 102. Rus Shuler, Fort Mill, SC > 103. Stacy Hammond, Fort Mill, SC > 104. Sandy Whitaker, Charlotte, NC > 105. Neely Dodge, NY, NY > 106. E Schlosberg Boston, MA > 107. K. Caswell, Ivoryton, CT > 108. Jerome Russo, Pennington, NJ > 109. Sarah Caguiat Borthwick, Brooklyn, NY > 110. Carlos J. Caguiat,Saranac Lake, NY > 111. Rick Dennis, Saranac Lake,NY > 112. Claire M. Stahler, Lake Placid, NY > 113. Carolyn Curwen, Lowell, MA > 114. Alison E. Curwen, Ojai, CA > 115. William A. Curwen, Ojai, CA > 116. Rick Swan, Ojai, CA > 117. Sonia Nordenson, Ojai, CA > 118. Rebecca Plum, Ojai, CA > 119. Mike Wilkerson Santa Barbara, CA. > 120. Jose Zamora, Berkeley, CA > 121. Amber Smock, Berkeley, CA > 122. Kimberly Cunningham, Berkeley, CA. > 123. Margot Hanson, Berkeley, CA > 124. Sarah Church, Berkeley, CA > 125. David Caeser, Berkeley, ca > 126. Catherine Trimbur, Berkeley, CA > 127. Lori Durbin, Oakland, Ca. > 128. Bebo White, San Francisco, CA > 129. Bruce Erickson, San Carlos, CA > 130. Don Erickson, Chicago, IL > 131. D. McCannon, Evanston IL > 132. G. Militello, Chicago, IL > 133. D. Wilson, New York, New York > 134. Kathy Murphy, Champaign, IL > 135. Cara L. Day, Champaign, IL > 136. Ualtar G. O'Regan, San Francisco, CA > 137. John C. Lester, Berkeley, CA > 138. Sara Hensley, San Jose, CA > 139. Paul Olguin, Pacifica, CA > 140. Jill Gluck,, Los Angeles, CA > 141. Millicent Alexander, Los Angeles, CA > 142. Jayme Adelson-Goldstein, Northridge, CA > 143. Sandra Brown, Sherman Oaks, CA > 144. Roland A. Childs, Los Angeles, CA > 145. Naomi Childs, Los Angeles, CA > 146. Ken Coleman. Santa Fe, NM > 147. John reynolds, Los Angeles CA > 148. Nathan Smith, Los Angeles, CA > 149. Gabriela Kohen, New York, NY > 150. Geoff Boehm, New York, NY > 151. Kermit Johns, New York NY > 152. Able Billheimer, New York NY > 153. Ann C. Horan, Summit, NJ > 154. Mary P. Lechevalier, Morrisville, VT > 155. Hubert A. Lechevalier, Morrisville, VT > 156. Marilyn J. Jordan, Huntington Station, NY > 157. Kay Bromberg, Roslyn Heights, NY > 158. Michael O'Neill, Wainscott, NY > 159. Janine Veto, NY > 160. Lysbeth A. Marigold, East Hampton, NY > 161. Adrienne Kitaeff, East Hampton, NY > 162. Kelly Patton Brook, Newcastle, Me > 163. Alexander Brook, Newcastle, Me > 164. Joanna Steichen, Montauk, NY > 165. Will Trinkle, Roanoke, VA > 166. Sheila Lobel, Hollis, NY > 167. Robert Werthman, Fairless Hills, PA > 168. L.A. Parks Daloz > 169. Sharon Daloz Parks > 170. John de Cuevas > 171. Bruce Baird Struminger, Ann Arbor, MI > 172. Leonadi Ward, La Crescenta,CA > 173. Tayria Ward, La Crescenta, CA > 174. Kurt Hoelting, Clinton, WA > 175. Sally Goodwin, Clinton, WA > 176. Ross Chapin, Langley, WA > 177. Linda Pruitt, Seattle, WA > 178. Jim Soules, Seattle, WA > 179. Joel Rogers, Seattle, WA > 180. Tom Darden, Seattle, WA > 181. Ellen Wallach, Seattle, WA > 182. Karen Lane, Seattle, WA > 183. Lynn Taylor, Mercer Island, WA > 184. Collin Tong, Seattle, WA > 185. Sara Robertson, Seattle,WA > 186. Namji Steinemann, New York, NY > 187. Grace Norman, New York, NY > 188. Rebecca Straus, New York, NY > 189. Gillian Tan, New York, NY > 190. Katherine Lynn, Somerville, MA > 191. Chris Herb, Madison, WI > 192. Kim Herb, Madison, WI > 193. Sarah Kilgour, Mogamimachi, Yamagata, Japan > 194. Wm. E. Kilgour, Madison, Wi > 195. Martha Kilgour, Madison, WI > 196. Audrey Kupferberg, Amsterdam, NY > 197. Rob Edelman, Amsterdam, NY > 198. Judith M Kass, New York, NY > 199. Milton Kass, New York, NY > 200. Jack Eichenbaum, Flushing, NY > 201. Lois M. Kahan, New York,NY > 202. Hal Temkin, Highland Park, IL > 203. Lois Sachs, Northfield, IL > 204. John Sachs, Northfield, IL > 205. Ellen Alter, Winnetka, IL > 206. Michael Alter, Winnetka, IL > 207. Margaret J. Tucker, Nashville, TN > 208. Jud Phillips, Nashville, TN > 209. Jane F. Osgerby, Nashville, TN > 210. Derek B. Petrella, Nashville, TN > 211. Kimberly M. Patterson, Wildwood Crest, NJ > 212 Katie M Arnold, Savannah, GA > 213. Matthew Arnold, Brooklyn NY > 214. April Lange, W. Barnstable, MA > 215. Ruth Benfield, Seattle, Wa > 216. William R. Benfield, Seattle, Wa > 217. Ashley Benfield, Seattle, Wa > 218. Morgan Benfield, Seattle, Wa > 219. Issen Powter, Gold Bar, WA > 220. Michael B. Plumb. Lynnwood, WA > 221. Norma L. Plumb, Lynnwood, WA > 222. Jonnee Denton, Bothell, WA > 223. Les Denton, Bothell, WA > 224. Susan Marett, Port Townsend, WA > 225. Robert Marett, Port Townsend, WA > 226. Patricia J. Yearian Port Townsend, WA > 227. Barbara Furlan, Seattle, WA > 228. Walt S. Dimick, Portland, OR > 229. Jennifer Meyers, Portland, OR > 230. Sarah Sameh, Portland, OR > 231. Eleanor Kittelson, St. Paul, MN > 232. Jan O'Donnell, Mpls, MN > 233. Rebecca Knittle, Saint Paul, MN > 234. Peggy A. Wiesenberg, Boston, MA > 235. Ann A. Fountain, Boston, MA > 236. Gio Gaynor, Boston,MA > 237. Lele Yu, Boston, MA > 238. Rebecca Ennen, Cambridge, MA > 239. Tova Goodman, Boston, MA > 240. Dana Simmons-Greco, Boston, MA > 241. Rory O'Connell, Boston, MA > 242. Debbie Moiles, Oxford, MA > 243. Barry Jones, Worcester, MA > 244. Bob Spera, Worcester, MA > 245. Linda Taylor, Sturbridge, MA > 246. Patricia J. Downe, Worcester, MA > 247. Carel Mulder, Worcester, MA > 248. Barbara Harris, Cambridge, MA > 249. Pamela Erdmann, Dublin,N.H. > 250. Russell M. Keith, Dublin, N. H. > 251. Ellen Balis, Cambridge, MA > 252. Doug McLeod, Cambridge, MA > 253. Susan Rubinroit, South Windsor CT > 254. Ken Edelston, Belfast, ME > 255. Susan Guthrie, Belfast, ME > 256. Heidi N. Brugger, Freedom, ME > 257. Patricia Clark, Unity, ME > 258. Peggy Gannon, Palmyra, ME > 259. Paul Lowe, Freeport, ME > 260. Barbara Wilmer, VA > 261. Ann Goette, VA > 262. Susan Morikawa, VA > 263. Kisti Beckwith, TX > 264. Nathan Beckwith, TX > 265. Michael Zeoli, TX > 266. Kirsten Singler, TX > 267. Jane Johnson, TX > 268. Diana Peyton, TX > 269. Tonya Edmond, St. Louis, MO > 270. Sally Haywood, St. Louis, MO > 271. Mary Jo Brauner, St. Louis, MO > 272. Jim Herning, PhD, MSW--St. Louis, MO > 273. Christie Huck, St. Louis, MO > 274. Wilson Powell, St. Louis, MO > 275. Connie Frisbee Houde > 276. Frank Houde > 277. Deb Cavanaugh, Albany, NY > 278. Marjorie Shaefer, Southfield, MI > 279. Blossom Kecskes, St.Clair Shores, MI > 280. Jeanette Bezanson, Madison Hts, MI > 281. Matthew Bezanson, Madison Hts, MI > 282. Marlene Babb, Harper Woods, MI > 283. Linda Liddicoatt, Harper Woods, MI > 284. Janet White, Oxford, MI > 285. Linda Lupo > 286. Karen Moran, Plymouth, MI > 287. David Drouillard, Carleton, MI > 288. Brian Philbin, Redondo Beach, CA > 289. Tom Nichols, La Habra, CA > 290. Janet Bratton, La Habra, CA > 291. Spencer Graves, Brea, CA > 292. Jo Graves, Brea CA > 293. Jim Crowley, Oxnard CA > 294. Annelle Hazlett, Waimea, HI > 295. Chuck Graybill, Hiawatha, IA > 296. Norma Graybill, Hiawatha, IA > 297. Richard Carroll, Marion, IA > 298. Dorothy Carroll, Marion, IA > 299. Daniel W. Adams, Cedar Rapids, IA > 300. David W. Funk, Cedar Rapids, IA > 301. Michael E. Maas, Cedar Rapids, IA > 302. Gladyce M. Maas, Cedar Rapids, IA > 303. Patty Ankrum, Mount Vernon, IA > 304. Bill Reiter, Mount Vernon. IA > > > > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:02:41 EST > From: Hawkeye255@aol.com > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: re Ineresting... > Message-ID: <6a.fe235c.25fa84b1@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > << ===The universe is more of a Mambo Jumbo.=== > so there. > > tch.tch. > Christine Bard > 0~>~<>~><~<>~<~0 >> > > I beg to differ...Tango Jumbo, I believe. Hah!!! So there!!! > hawkeye > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:20:16 EST > From: SoundFNR@aol.com > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: mpx1 vs. mpx 500 > Message-ID: <da.1fd091c.25fa88d0@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > In a message dated 10/03/00 01:39:45 GMT Standard Time, gripcode@hotmail.com > writes: > > > in order to compare the 1 to the 500; > > > > the routing possibilities > > - i've heard about problems with the mpx 1's pitch shifting taking to > > much place in the well crafted 1's dual processors and memory. > > does that mean nessesarily that the routing in the 1 is bad when i >use > > -the pitch or any orther effects? > > -how many effect can i go through? > > -are there any other effects taking to much place? > > Can't answer all your questions, try ghogan@lexicon.com > ...and keep in mind that I haven't actually used either, > I'm a MPX100 user who's researched them as a possible upgrade. > > >can i loop on the 500 and have my guitar playing through? > yes > > >tremolo + rotation > trems excellent > rotations very good > (can only be better than the MPX100) > > >pitch shift MPX1 > the fact this uses up processing power could be a sign it works well, > ... the pitch on the MPX100 only works well on single note I/P > possibly the MPX500 is the same. > > Basically I reckon the MPX1 is much more powerful than the 500, > it belongs in a higher price bracket than the 500. > ...but the 500 is newer (&cheaper) > > if the loop facility in the 500 is identical to the 100, then it may > share the problems, I'd suggest you try out an infinite loop > while receiving midi-clock and see if the signal degrades. > > > > > Andy Butler > Lexicon Vortex Database > http://members.aol.com/soundfnr/vortex.htm _______________________________________________________ Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite Visit http://freeworld.excite.com