Support |
Last night I had one of the most productive evenings of making music I've had in quite some time. I did it by abandoning my two "grooveboxes" (an E-MU XL-7 and a Korg Electribe ESX-1) in favor of using my computer running Digital Performer in conjunction with a Native Instruments BATTERY 2 demo. It was really liberating being able to create beats so quickly and arrange them into a song like structure without even having to stop the sequencer to quantize parts, all the time my Repeater chasing along. The Battery 2 Demo had some great kits that inspired some traditional stuff as well as quirky weird stuff to. FUN. I'd been resisting the siren call of the computer for this type of music for a long time... not even sure why. In other aspects of my life I've done things like sold all my oil paint and brushes to buy Painter and a Wacom tablet. I've probably spent so many years working in music stores dealing with hardware sequencers/drummachines that it just feels comfortable. No more. Like a comfortable old shoe that's just not supporting your new rock climbing sport, I'm going to move up the technology chain. I'm still going to keep my Command Station because it's still kick ass for making a quick beat and a good interface, but man am I not going to compose or lug that sucker around any longer. I thought the sound of Battery was as good if not better than my E-MU's ROM samples. LONG cymbals. MMmm mmm good. So here's my question: Battery? Is that the thing for me? Should I try something more robust like Kontakt? Mach 5? Sampletank. I still plan on using hardware synths for a lot of my sound so my main use for this would be drums and bass to support my guitar and synth loops. I'm running a Mac so it would need to be OSX compatable and work with DIgital Performer 4.6. (MAS or AU's would be fine) What say ye? Mark __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com