Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Personally, I'm warming up to "SooperPooperLooperScooper" : ) On 11/19/05, Warren Sirota <wsirota@wsdesigns.com> wrote: > Tim, that's a great list - thanks! I am really attracted to a variant of >one > of the names you suggest: D'Loop. I had been thinking of something like > "Loop De Loop", but that scans horribly - hadn't thought of the >apostrophe > or leaving out one of the "Loops". > > Thanks, > Warren Sirota > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Thompson [mailto:tjt@nosuch.com] > > Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 1:22 AM > > To: 'Warren Sirota' > > Subject: RE: Naming a software looper > > > > > > Loopadelic > > Repetitious > > LoopFactory > > SimplyLooping > > LoopWrangler > > Circular Reasoning > > D'Looper > > Loops of Love > > Le Looper > > Cirque du Looper > > Deja Vu, or just Deja > > > > ...Tim... > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Warren Sirota [mailto:wsirota@wsdesigns.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:56 PM > > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > > Subject: Naming a software looper > > > > Thanks, Stephen. I agree with you that names are important. > > That's why I'm struggling with it. > > > > I had a dream right before I woke up this morning - I don't > > remember what the dream was about, but one word was prominent > > in it: Helio. It doesn't have anything to do with looping, > > but then neither does Ableton (many other products are not > > named to reflect their capabilities). A dictionary search > > reveals that "Helios" was the god of the sun or something like that. > > > > So there's one name. Another that I thought of was MultiLoop, > > but I'm not sure how well that really reflects anything. I > > also thought of "FNEZ Looper" (read it out loud), but that's > > a bit on the crude side, I guess. One person I talked to > > liked it, someone else cringed. Cringing is not good. > > > > The things that are most unique about this looper (I think, I > > hope) are: > > > > - instant gratification, easy learning curve > > - Can be operated in hands-free mode; works with most > > footcontrollers (but a multi-bank footcontroller is best; > > basic functions can be in the first bank, advanced functions > > in others) > > - CD-quality, stereo looping > > - loop layers are independently mutable and re-mixable > > - built in digital multitrack recorder makes pristine > > recordings of your live playing, your loops and aux inputs > > (like the people you're playing > > with) > > - peak limiting on the output. In later versions, different > > forms of multiband compression will be supported > > - with a touch of your toe (here I go into marketing-speak), > > you can save all the loops into individual files for later > > processing with Acid or the DAW of your choice. > > - PC (XP) and MAC (OS/X) > > - affordability - I anticipate 3 versions, one at $89 or so, > > one at $199 and one at $299. > > - support for VST plugins to modify the input to the looper > > and the total mix output > > > > At present, it's a fairly basic looper/recorder. In addition > > to the basic looper, reverse is there, as well as > > continuously-varying playback speed, controlled by footpedal > > or mouse (the pitch changes, but it's a pretty good effect). > > But the architecture is very solid, and I expect to be adding > > fancy effects rapidly once I get past the initial hurdles of > > documentation, installers, security (I hate dealing with sw > > security, but you gotta do it), press releases and all that stuff. > > > > I put a couple of screenshots up at > > www.warrensirota.com/looper so you can get a better idea. > > > > I'd love naming suggestions suggestions and votes on the ones > > I've got: Helio (or Helios) and MultiLoop. > > > > Thanks, > > Warren Sirota > > www.warrensirota.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: S V G [mailto:vsyevolod@yahoo.com] > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:22 PM > > > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > > > Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V05 #746 > > > > > > > > > > > > Warren, > > > > > > Naming can be a very powerful thing. Especially if > > you are able > > > to describe within the name what is unique about the object to be > > > named. Secondarily, the name can be pleasant to the ear, > > or at least > > > memorable. Associations with other products is usually not > > > desireable. > > > > > > When I hear the name AccuLoop, my mind immediately goes to all > > > the cheaply designed and built woodworking tools from overseas. > > > "Accu" as a prefix, just doesn't instill confidence in a > > product, at > > > least to this boy. > > > > > > Naming your looper has the potential to make it or break it. A > > > good example is the software called Chopitch. Does it mean > > that your > > > chops will start itching? > > > > > > Good luck finding an appropriate name for it. > > > Currently, AccuLoop doesn't do much for me. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Stephen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warren wrote: > > > It's a little hard for me to complete the docs, though, > > because I'm at > > > sea for a name. I'm thinking maybe AccuLoop. > > > Whaddya think? (that, totally without an explanation of > > what makes it > > > special, is not exactly an easy question - but whether the > > name should > > > be related to the specific features or not is also not an easy one). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > > Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! > > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > > > > > > > > -- Art Simon simart@null.net http://art.simon.tripod.com http://artsimon.iuma.com