Support |
----- Original Message ----- From: "CV" <c.voit@vtx.ch> > > Thank you Miko > I agree 200 % > Krispen > Keller W. is not here for the hugest plug in farm, the most creative 7/8 > meter. he is not a shooe or gear gazer, he looks at people and in the > eyes > and brings them pleasure. > he may be much more creative in his own style than you are in yours but > without reevaluating your ego you may never know > > Claude You guys are so hypersensitive! Good grief. I agree with your points, partly because I think they are obvious and don't require debate. I'm not going to debate that any popular rock/pop artist isn't successful based on one set of criteria. I'm not fucking stupid, but what I don't see here is folks continuously affirming the obvious rather than trying to understand that there is another story to be told, from a different set of criteria. >From the outset of my first comments on Keller, I stated things that >affirm everything you and Mike say above. Yet, not once am I hearing anyone compromise and admit that there is another perspective. What I see, instead, is Argumentum ad Hominems in place of compromise (and I think any sort of direct personal attacks in this sort of forum are disgusting and uncalled for). So, I'll fully state again for the record: Keller is successful at what he does and given his audience. BUT, what he's doing, historically, is not that creative or inspiring to me artistically or from a looping perspective (the topic of this discussion forum). If folks have a problem admitting that there are two sides to the story, then I'd question who really is intolerant, prejudice, or not evaluating their egos. I'm not seeing a lot of acceptance of multiple ideas here, but continuous focus on a single perspective. I'd make my point and admitted both sides. K-