Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: looping and the public and categorization



Andy added the following to that huge brand name discussion:
> What the public doesn't know is that looping technology can be used
> to create music such as has not been heard before, that it's
> possible to "take it to the next level", to quote an appreciative
> audience member.
Why would the public want to know? Why would they care?
This goes in line with my theory about audiences perceiving music 
(unless they are either dedicated or nerdy musicians or musicologists on 
a mission): The audience does not care how exactly it's made. They only 
care how it sounds and in the case of live performance/videos how it looks.
(this theory needn't be true, it's merely based on a relatively small 
sample, but here's some related thesis: http://fwd4.me/0fD)

> Since the introduction of the Roland machines, which are hardly
> designed as a spring board for the imagination, the world
>
...with the exception of the DD20 ;)