Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Bill i never really understood either why stereo looping was so important
But now that i have the new digitech stereo looper,man it does make a
difference specially when you loop the stereo fx the line 6 m9 has to
offer.
I know for us guitarrists is maybe not always that important, but
Sjaak does beautiful dreamy synth soundscapes where space and dimesion
is crucial
I remember listening to him and being lost in his sound, it sounded
huge and it would be a pity to sacrifice his signal with a mono
looper;-)
Luis
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:44 AM, William Walker <billwalker@baymoon.com> wrote:
> The HD has a mono in (actually an extra aux in as well but not meant for
> stereo apps) , it does have a stereo out, can't say about the looper though
> I assume its mono, I can't for the life of me see how this is terribly
> important unless it was a true stereo multi track looper like the LP-1 and
> you wanted to pan tracks in the stereo field, or you have a stereo output
> like I assume you do Sjaak and you needed to preserve your imaging. stereo
> is great for studio mix down but in a live situation it can cause you
> phase cancellation issues where, unless you are standing in a sweet spot,
> you might stop being able to hear a crucial element of your mix like
> something rhythmic you need to hear. If you gotta have panning or stereo
> imaging this is a workaround: I use an M-9, but I rarely use anything other
> than delays of various types, and the occasional specialty reverbs, ring
> modulator, or filters , so I park the looper in front of other effects so i
> can reprocess it with stereo delays (or any of the M-9's stereo modulation
> effects or panners ) and send it in stereo to the LP-1, then resample if i
> want . Problem solved
>
> Bill
>
>