Support |
Andre LaFosse wrote: > > future perfect wrote: > > > > For me, it is easier to listen to free music if I know the 'noise' >being > > made isn't just a limitation of of the performers involved. In other >words, > > I can enjoy Thrakattak because I respect what the muscians involved are > > capable of. > > See, this is an extremely problematic issue for me. It smacks of what > I'd call the emperor's new clothes syndrome -- the music in quesiton is > judged more on the pedigree of the players than on the actual sound > that's produced. > > At this point in time, I've got very little patience for music that > needs some sort of extra-musical justification in order to have it hold > up -- be it the intellecual conceptualism behind an experimental project > that doesn't hold up on its own, or the straight-ahead pedigree that > gives a jazz player the licence to then play "out" and not be chastized > by his peers, or the talk of "breakbeat science" and "progression" > that's used to pass of the profoundly stiff and boring sounds of a lot > of modern drum & bass. > > Not meant as a flame to anyone; maybe I'll see the light later on. But > I find it awfully frustrating when people find themselves obligated to > give music a certain amount of automatic regard simply by virtue of > associations of any kind. It's *sound*, for crying out loud! What does > it *sound* like?! > > --Andre i would agree here up to a point... not long ago i was listening to fripp's "that which passes" when a (non-musician) friend walked in.. she asked "whats that, keyboard?" and i said "no, its just one guitar"... she said "wow, hmmmm... if it was keyboard would you be listening to this?"... hmmm.. if someone made music *exactly* like fripp's soundscape series (and there was no fripp) using multitracked keyboards... would you buy it? i dont think i would (well, at least i wouldnt actively seek it out)... but while it may seem a bit more logical making this sort of music using *all* the technology available, i think the limits imposed by just having one guitar *does* give it some sort of extra-musical justification (just dont ask me to pin it down). sometimes knowing the setup/process/players can turn the sound into a more satisfying thing or kill it completely for me, other times it just doesnt matter (i once heard this amazing piece that turned out to be a few contact mikes on some telephone lines in the desert -- i was kind of bummed that no-one was actually *playing* but still very much enjoyed it) brad