Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
|
I use my fingers too, Mark, and I'm not the best a math, and my wife also
does all the finances in the house, but I kicked butt in logic at the
university and was able to convert entire paragraphs of common language
arguments into sybolic logic and tell whether they were valid or not. Math and
logic are releated (Russell thought one gave rise to the other), and being good
at one doesn't mean being good at the other.
If I had to take an educated guess, I'd say being good at math is
sufficient to be good at logic (M-->L), but being good at logic is not
sufficient to be good at math, in other words, not (L-->M), which means that
L<-->M is not true. :) Otherwise, everyone person I
found that is good at logic would be good at math, which is false (me being the
first instance).
Kris
|